You can find full examples showing different code coverage setups in the
There is a series of videos we have recorded showing code coverage in Cypress How to instrument react-scripts web application for code coverage That Cypress can perform can effectively cover a lot of back end code.
Second, we would like to capture the code coverage from the locally runningīack end server that is serving the front end web application and handles theĪPI requests from the web application under test. You can find aīahmutov/cypress-native-chrome-code-coverage-example That can be collected by the Chrome browser's V8 engine. Step using the Istanbul.js library and instead capture the native code coverage First, we would like to avoid the "manual" instrumentation We are currently exploring two additional features for code coverage duringĮnd-to-end tests. You can also find full stack code coverage in ourĮven if you only want to measure the back end code coverage Cypress can help.īack end Code Coverage from Cypress API tests You can explore the above combined full stack coverage report at theĬoveralls.io/github/cypress-io/cypress-example-conduit-appĭashboard. It ( 'adds and completes todos', ( ) => įrom now on, the front end code coverage collected during end-to-end tests willīe merged with the code coverage from the instrumented back end code and saved To instrument the code as part of its transpilation. Instead of using the npx instrument command, we can use Increment the counters and flip some of the zero counters into positive numbers.
Statements were each executed once and the last statement was never executed (it In green, we highlighted the 4 statements present in that file. For example the file src/index.js has the following information: If we drill into the coverage object we can see the statements executed in eachįile. We can see the counters if we serve the instrumented folder instead of Information is stored in a single object attached to the browser's window Notice the calls to cov_18hmhptych.s++ and cov_18hmhptych.s++ that s ++, createStore (reducer ) )Ĭov_18hmhptych. I think in the future it becomes harder and harder to write plugins in C++ because lacks of support from browsers.Const store = (cov_18hmhptych.
I will update this answer once I find more. In another word, it is not maintained(and removed from Qt 5.0) You can not find it in documentation later than QT 4.5. The author thinks that NPAPI is going to die so he has no plan to support Linux or add new features. It is not specially for creating browser plugins.
And from the comments of the wiki page: We can know that users could not get help at all and were having trouble get it running on Windows I don't think that it is being actively developed. In short, if you want something that FireBreath currently does not provide, you will have a bad luck, it is very hard to add new features. And he created a lot of bat or shell scripts and cmake macros, it is very hard to understand and configure.
The author uses cmake to orgnize code and sub-projects. Yes you can use external boost, but I spent several days configuring and tweaking and still cannot get it compiling on Windows. But FireBreath does not contain boost/locale. I believe that boost/locale can resolve this issue. For example: if there are Chinese characters in a file name, you cannot read the content of that file. I did find some cons: It does not support utf-8 characters on Windows. You can create a cross platform browser plugin with FireBreath in a few days. I think it is almost the best one available. I investigated some frameworks listed by Georg, here is what I get:įireBreath.